PaddleOCRvsWinter CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | Winter CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 91 869 | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +428 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 7 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.
PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Winter CMS.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+428 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →Winter CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep Winter CMS, compare it with