PaddleOCRvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 91 859 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +418 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for PaddleOCR.
If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+418 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with