PaddleOCRvsTryton
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | Tryton | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #3 of 14 in ERP |
| GitHub stars | 91 901 | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +460 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | — |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 68/100 for Tryton, so it is the safer default.
PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tryton.
If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; Tryton needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+460 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →Tryton details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep Tryton, compare it with