PaddleOCRvsTrinity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | Trinity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #60 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 91 895 | 711 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +454 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 4 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.
PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Trinity.
If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; Trinity needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+454 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →Trinity details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep Trinity, compare it with