PaddleOCRvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 91 843 | 117 613 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +402 | +5 254 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 85/100 for PaddleOCR, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for PaddleOCR.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 254 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with