PaddleOCRvsTeleport
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | Teleport | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #4 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 91 859 | 21 040 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +418 | +104 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 6 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v18.10.0 · 8 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 76/100 for Teleport, so it is the safer default.
PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Teleport.
If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; Teleport needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+418 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →Teleport details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep Teleport, compare it with