PaddleOCRvsrushdb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | rushdb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #5 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 91 938 | 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +497 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 33 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v3.0.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 48/100 for rushdb, so it is the safer default.
rushdb ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PaddleOCR.
If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; rushdb needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+497 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →rushdb details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep rushdb, compare it with