PaddleOCRvsRembg
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | Rembg | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #1 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 91 868 | 25 216 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +427 | +77 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v2.0.86 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 78/100 for Rembg, so it is the safer default.
Rembg ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for PaddleOCR.
If you want the quickest setup, Rembg is easier to run; PaddleOCR needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+427 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →Rembg details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep Rembg, compare it with