PaddleOCRvsracktables
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | racktables | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #16 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 91 931 | 813 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +490 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 47/100 for racktables, so it is the safer default.
PaddleOCR ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for racktables.
If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; racktables needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+490 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →racktables details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep racktables, compare it with