PaddleOCRvsQloApps
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | QloApps | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #2 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking |
| GitHub stars | 91 912 | 14 452 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +471 | +66 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | OSL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 68/100 for QloApps, so it is the safer default.
PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for QloApps.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+471 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →QloApps details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep QloApps, compare it with