PaddleOCRvsQFieldCloud
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | QFieldCloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 91 926 | 246 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +485 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.
QFieldCloud ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for PaddleOCR.
If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; QFieldCloud needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+485 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →QFieldCloud details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep QFieldCloud, compare it with