PaddleOCRvsPimcore
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | Pimcore | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #6 of 18 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 91 926 | 3 883 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +485 | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 35 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v2026.3.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 61/100 for Pimcore, so it is the safer default.
Pimcore ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PaddleOCR.
If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; Pimcore needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+485 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →Pimcore details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep Pimcore, compare it with