PaddleOCR LocalvsTwenty
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR Local | Twenty | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #35 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 21 in CRM |
| GitHub stars | 138 | 60 046 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 588 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | twenty/v2.52.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Twenty scores 84/100 against 44/100 for PaddleOCR Local, so it is the safer default.
Twenty ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for PaddleOCR Local.
If you want the quickest setup, Twenty is easier to run; PaddleOCR Local needs more configuration.
Twenty is growing faster right now (+2 588 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR Local details →Twenty details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR Local, compare it with
Keep Twenty, compare it with