ibl.ai/osvssdnext
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ibl.ai/os | sdnext | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #65 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 793 | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.182.2 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 55/100 for ibl.ai/os, so it is the safer default.
ibl.ai/os ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; ibl.ai/os needs more configuration.
sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
ibl.ai/os details →sdnext details →