OrcavsWinter CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Orca | Winter CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 109 022 | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 115 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.
Orca ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Winter CMS.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; Winter CMS needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+9 115 stars in 30 days).
Orca details →Winter CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep Orca, compare it with
Keep Winter CMS, compare it with