OrcavsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Orca | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 108 815 | 35 793 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 908 | +868 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 28 |
| Latest release | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 81/100 for SeaweedFS, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Orca.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+8 908 stars in 30 days).
Orca details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Orca, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with