OrcavsruTorrent
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Orca | ruTorrent | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 12 in Bittorrent |
| GitHub stars | 109 264 | 2 188 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 357 | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 20 |
| Latest release | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 | v5.3.19 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 62/100 for ruTorrent, so it is the safer default.
ruTorrent ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Orca.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; ruTorrent needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+9 357 stars in 30 days).
Orca details →ruTorrent details →
Swap a project
Keep Orca, compare it with
Keep ruTorrent, compare it with