Orcavsrushdb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Orca | rushdb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 109 348 | 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 441 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 33 |
| Latest release | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 | v3.0.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 48/100 for rushdb, so it is the safer default.
rushdb ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Orca.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; rushdb needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+9 441 stars in 30 days).
Orca details →rushdb details →
Swap a project
Keep Orca, compare it with
Keep rushdb, compare it with