Orcavsqm-music
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Orca | qm-music | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 108 898 | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 991 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
Orca ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.
Orca is growing faster right now (+8 991 stars in 30 days).
Orca details →qm-music details →
Swap a project
Keep Orca, compare it with
Keep qm-music, compare it with