OrcavsPicImpact
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Orca | PicImpact | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #14 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 108 898 | 1 315 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 991 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 | v3.3.8 · 23 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 57/100 for PicImpact, so it is the safer default.
Orca ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for PicImpact.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; PicImpact needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+8 991 stars in 30 days).
Orca details →PicImpact details →
Swap a project
Keep Orca, compare it with
Keep PicImpact, compare it with