OrcaQvssupabase
Two self-hosted Database Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OrcaQ | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #35 of 40 in Database Management | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 225 | 114 248 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 539 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.1.14 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 49/100 for OrcaQ, so it is the safer default.
OrcaQ ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, OrcaQ is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 539 stars in 30 days).
OrcaQ details →supabase details →All Database Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep OrcaQ, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with