OrangeHRMvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OrangeHRM | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Human Resource Management (HRM) | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 1 158 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 6 |
| Latest release | v5.9 · 28 Jun 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 61/100 for OrangeHRM, so it is the safer default.
Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for OrangeHRM.
If you want the quickest setup, OrangeHRM is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).
OrangeHRM details →Tube Archivist details →