horillavsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| horilla | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Human Resource Management (HRM) | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 1 478 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 6 |
| Latest release | 2.2.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-2.1 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | HTML | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 60/100 for horilla, so it is the safer default.
horilla ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, horilla is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
horilla details →Tube Archivist details →