OpenWrtvstxtdot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenWrt | txtdot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Operating System | #19 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 28 967 | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +464 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 5 |
| Latest release | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 | v1.10.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 47/100 for txtdot, so it is the safer default.
OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for txtdot.
If you want the quickest setup, txtdot is easier to run; OpenWrt needs more configuration.
OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+464 stars in 30 days).
OpenWrt details →txtdot details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenWrt, compare it with
Keep txtdot, compare it with