OpenWrtvsTrenova
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenWrt | Trenova | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Operating System | #2 of 2 in Fleet Management |
| GitHub stars | 28 967 | 314 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +464 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 9 |
| Latest release | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 | v0.10.5 · 13 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 41/100 for Trenova, so it is the safer default.
OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Trenova.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenWrt is easier to run; Trenova needs more configuration.
OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+464 stars in 30 days).
OpenWrt details →Trenova details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenWrt, compare it with
Keep Trenova, compare it with