OpenWrtvstextpod
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenWrt | textpod | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Operating System | #54 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 28 968 | 322 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +455 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 3 |
| Latest release | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 | 0.1.8 · 29 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 45/100 for textpod, so it is the safer default.
OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for textpod.
If you want the quickest setup, textpod is easier to run; OpenWrt needs more configuration.
OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+455 stars in 30 days).
OpenWrt details →textpod details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenWrt, compare it with
Keep textpod, compare it with