Standard NotesvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Standard Notes | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 6 685 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +53 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 6 |
| Latest release | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
Standard Notes scores 70/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Standard Notes.
Standard Notes is growing faster right now (+53 stars in 30 days).
Standard Notes details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep Standard Notes, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with