OpenWAvsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenWA | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in API Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 16 343 | 95 248 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +337 | +2 335 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 25 |
| Latest release | v0.26.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 77/100 for OpenWA, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for OpenWA.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenWA is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 335 stars in 30 days).
OpenWA details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenWA, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with