OpenStreetMapvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenStreetMap | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Maps | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 2 868 | 8 652 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenStreetMap and Workout.cool score the same (66/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Workout.cool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OpenStreetMap.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; OpenStreetMap needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).
OpenStreetMap details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenStreetMap, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with