Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM)vsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Navigation | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 8 179 | 8 652 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +74 | +153 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 1 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) scores 71/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+153 stars in 30 days).
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM), compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with