OpenStreetMapvsRustDesk Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenStreetMap | RustDesk Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Maps | #4 of 22 in Remote Desktop |
| GitHub stars | 2 867 | 10 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 | +179 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | 1.1.16 · 20 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
RustDesk Server scores 75/100 against 66/100 for OpenStreetMap, so it is the safer default.
RustDesk Server ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OpenStreetMap.
If you want the quickest setup, RustDesk Server is easier to run; OpenStreetMap needs more configuration.
RustDesk Server is growing faster right now (+179 stars in 30 days).
OpenStreetMap details →RustDesk Server details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenStreetMap, compare it with
Keep RustDesk Server, compare it with