OpenSlidesvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenSlides | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Conference Management | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 661 | 6 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +15 | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 0 |
| Latest release | 4.3.6 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Zammad scores 70/100 against 56/100 for OpenSlides, so it is the safer default.
OpenSlides ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
Zammad is growing faster right now (+101 stars in 30 days).
OpenSlides details →Zammad details →