ClapervsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Claper | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 18 in Content Management | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 821 | 6 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Elixir | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Zammad scores 70/100 against 59/100 for Claper, so it is the safer default.
Claper ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, Claper is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Zammad is growing faster right now (+101 stars in 30 days).
Claper details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Claper, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with