Openshipvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Openship | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in PaaS | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 14 972 | 93 035 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +102 | +1 288 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.9.5 · 24 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 67/100 for Openship, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Openship.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Openship needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 288 stars in 30 days).
Openship details →uptime-kuma details →