OpenSearchvsTraceRoot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenSearch | TraceRoot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 41 in Search Engines | #11 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 13 929 | 1 133 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +154 | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 10 |
| Latest release | 2.19.7 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.3.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenSearch scores 76/100 against 58/100 for TraceRoot, so it is the safer default.
OpenSearch ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for TraceRoot.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenSearch is easier to run; TraceRoot needs more configuration.
OpenSearch is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).
OpenSearch details →TraceRoot details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenSearch, compare it with
Keep TraceRoot, compare it with