OpenSearchvsstatusnook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenSearch | statusnook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 41 in Search Engines | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 13 927 | 988 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +152 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 0 |
| Latest release | 2.19.7 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Go |
Which one should you pick?
OpenSearch scores 76/100 against 51/100 for statusnook, so it is the safer default.
OpenSearch ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for statusnook.
If you want the quickest setup, statusnook is easier to run; OpenSearch needs more configuration.
OpenSearch is growing faster right now (+152 stars in 30 days).
OpenSearch details →statusnook details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenSearch, compare it with
Keep statusnook, compare it with