OpenReadervstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 24 039 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +779 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 11 |
| Latest release | v5.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with