OpenReadervsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
OpenReader scores 59/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with