bookorbitvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 5 877 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 247 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit scores 73/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 247 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with