OpenReadervsSandBase Harness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | SandBase Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #169 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 636 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 9 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.3.8 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenReader scores 59/100 against 39/100 for SandBase Harness, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for SandBase Harness.
OpenReader is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →SandBase Harness details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep SandBase Harness, compare it with