OpenReadervsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 44 995 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +1 622 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 34 |
| Latest release | v5.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for OpenReader.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 622 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with