LibationvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Libation | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 375 | 44 995 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 | +1 622 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 34 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 68/100 for Libation, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 33 for Libation.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 622 stars in 30 days).
Libation details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep Libation, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with