OpenReadervsPostal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | Postal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #3 of 16 in Mail Server |
| GitHub stars | 549 | 16 898 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 | +74 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 3 |
| Latest release | v5.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | 3.3.7 · 3 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Postal scores 72/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Postal.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; Postal needs more configuration.
Postal is growing faster right now (+74 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →Postal details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep Postal, compare it with