OpenReadervsPercona Monitoring and Management (PMM)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | Percona Monitoring and Management (PMM) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #21 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 549 | 1 121 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 9 |
| Latest release | v5.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v3.10.0 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Percona Monitoring and Management (PMM) scores 64/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Percona Monitoring and Management (PMM).
OpenReader is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →Percona Monitoring and Management (PMM) details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep Percona Monitoring and Management (PMM), compare it with