Percona Monitoring and Management (PMM)vsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Percona Monitoring and Management (PMM) | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 40 in Database Management | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 121 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +14 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 21 |
| Latest release | v3.10.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Percona Monitoring and Management (PMM) and ReadMeABook score the same (64/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Percona Monitoring and Management (PMM).
If you want the quickest setup, Percona Monitoring and Management (PMM) is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
ReadMeABook is growing faster right now (+65 stars in 30 days).
Percona Monitoring and Management (PMM) details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep Percona Monitoring and Management (PMM), compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with