openobservevsTidal Echo
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openobserve | Tidal Echo | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #61 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 22 587 | 329 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +466 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.1.2 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
openobserve scores 78/100 against 47/100 for Tidal Echo, so it is the safer default.
openobserve ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tidal Echo.
If you want the quickest setup, openobserve is easier to run; Tidal Echo needs more configuration.
openobserve is growing faster right now (+466 stars in 30 days).
openobserve details →Tidal Echo details →
Swap a project
Keep openobserve, compare it with
Keep Tidal Echo, compare it with