openobservevsTaskwarrior
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openobserve | Taskwarrior | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #2 of 15 in Productivity |
| GitHub stars | 22 592 | 6 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +471 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.1.2 · 20 Oct 2026 | v3.5.0 · 16 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
openobserve scores 78/100 against 68/100 for Taskwarrior, so it is the safer default.
openobserve ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Taskwarrior.
If you want the quickest setup, Taskwarrior is easier to run; openobserve needs more configuration.
openobserve is growing faster right now (+471 stars in 30 days).
openobserve details →Taskwarrior details →
Swap a project
Keep openobserve, compare it with
Keep Taskwarrior, compare it with