openobservevsSerena-MCP
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openobserve | Serena-MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #4 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 22 553 | 30 801 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +436 | +1 047 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.1.2 · 20 Oct 2026 | v2.1.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Serena-MCP scores 82/100 against 78/100 for openobserve, so it is the safer default.
openobserve ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Serena-MCP.
If you want the quickest setup, Serena-MCP is easier to run; openobserve needs more configuration.
Serena-MCP is growing faster right now (+1 047 stars in 30 days).
openobserve details →Serena-MCP details →
Swap a project
Keep openobserve, compare it with
Keep Serena-MCP, compare it with