openobservevsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openobserve | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 22 553 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +436 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 21 |
| Latest release | v1.1.2 · 20 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openobserve scores 78/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
openobserve ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for ReadMeABook.
If you want the quickest setup, openobserve is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
openobserve is growing faster right now (+436 stars in 30 days).
openobserve details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep openobserve, compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with