OpenMapTilesvsWildbox
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenMapTiles | Wildbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 166 in Developer Tools | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 3 211 | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +40 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.16 · 18 Dec 2025 | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | PLpgSQL | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OpenMapTiles scores 65/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.
Wildbox ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenMapTiles.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenMapTiles is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.
OpenMapTiles is growing faster right now (+40 stars in 30 days).
OpenMapTiles details →Wildbox details →